4.7 Article

Construction noise effects on human health: Evidence from physiological measures

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 91, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104470

关键词

Construction noise; Physiological parameters; Environmental impact; Urban environment; Occupational health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Construction noise in urban areas is a major issue causing noise pollution. This study used physiological data to investigate the impact of construction noise on human health. It identified the effects of different construction noise types, levels, and exposure durations on heart rate parameters and respiratory activity.
Noise pollution caused by construction activities in urban areas is a serious problem. Construction noise can affect human health and well-being negatively. This study utilised physiological data including heart rate parameters, Respiratory Rate (RR), and Electrodermal Activity (EDA) to explore the effects of construction noise on human health. Different construction noise types (saw, jackhammer, pile driver, bulldozer), levels (55, 65, 75 and 85 dBA), and exposure durations (30, 60, 120, and 180 s) were examined in a lab-based experiment. The noise conditions were reproduced for twenty-three participants through speakers. To statistically analyse the changes in the physiological measures caused by the examined noise conditions, mixed models were utilised. The results revealed significant effects of the construction noise types on heart rate parameters including heart rate (HR), high frequency (HF), and standard deviation of the normal beat intervals (SDNN). In addition, the results showed that exposure duration significantly affects physiological responses, including RR and SDNN. This study will help to identify the non-auditory health effects of exposure to construction noise. The outputs of this research will provide critical inputs to revisit the current environmental noise regulations to protect the community against the negative health effects of construction noise more efficiently.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据