4.7 Article

Mold growth under near-saturated preservation environment of unearthed relics within archaeological museums

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 93, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104517

关键词

Mold growth; Near -saturation; RH; Unearthed sites; Microclimate; Conservation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the mold growth on the surface of inorganic unearthed sites under near-saturated conditions. The results showed that higher relative humidity had an inhibitory effect on mold growth, while salt content was positively correlated with mold growth. This study provides basic knowledge for understanding mold growth characteristics and proposing prevention strategies in near-saturated environments.
Mold is an important deterioration risk to in situ preserved relics since they require a high relative humidity (RH) preservation environment to maintain their original state as before unearthed. However, few studies have been conducted to characterize mold growth on the surface of inorganic unearthed sites under saturated RH condi-tions. In this study, four groups of soil samples with different salt content were placed in different RH envi-ronments to assess mold growth under near-saturated conditions based on previously completed simulations of unearthed sites in an exhibition hall and an experimental platform for the environmental control system to preserve cultural relics. The very high RH (> 99%) of the near-saturated environment had a higher inhibitory effect on mold growth compared with the RH of 80-90%, which is favorable for mold growth. This inhibitory effect was not remarkably different from that of a dry environment. As salt content is proportional to mold growth on the surface of unearthed sites, a reduction in the former significantly inhibited the latter. This study provides basic knowledge about the characteristics of mold growth for unearthed sites in a near-saturated environment and proposes novel ideas for its prevention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据