4.7 Article

Improving microbiological and physicochemical properties of fresh-cut apples using carvacrol emulsions

期刊

FOOD BIOSCIENCE
卷 52, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fbio.2023.102450

关键词

Carvacrol emulsion; Preservation; Fresh-cut apples; Browning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cut or sliced form of apples is more vulnerable to chemical deterioration and microbial growth. This study investigated the quality changes and microbial safety of fresh-cut apples stored at 4 degrees C for 15 days after different immersion treatments. Carvacrol emulsions based on whey protein isolate/high methoxyl pectin effectively delayed browning and improved the chemical quality consistency. Furthermore, the presence of carvacrol emulsions reduced viable bacteria and yeast and mold growth during storage. Carvacrol emulsions have the potential to be an alternative preservation method for fresh-cut apples.
The cut or sliced form of apples are more prone to chemical deterioration and microbial growth. In this work, quality changes (physicochemical properties, sensory quality, and microbial growth) of fresh-cut apples stored at 4 degrees C for 15 days were studied after immersion treatment (water, biopolymer complex; free carvacrol, and carvacrol emulsion). Whey protein isolate/high methoxyl pectin-based carvacrol emulsions effectively delayed the browning process and reduced variation in chemical quality compared to other groups. Apples treated with carvacrol emulsions were more favored by panelists at the middle-and late-stages of storage. Additionally, the presence of carvacrol emulsions improved microbial safety, as demonstrated by the number of viable bacteria (<6 log CFU/g) and yeast and mold (<5 log CFU/g) after 15 d of storage. 16 S rRNA Gene Sequencing was used to identify the bacterial species responsible for the spoilage of fresh-cut apples. These results show that carvacrol emulsions are a potential preservation alternative for fresh-cut apples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据