4.7 Article

Green tea polysaccharide conjugates and gelatin enhanced viability of L. acidophilus by layer-by-layer encapsulation

期刊

FOOD BIOSCIENCE
卷 52, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fbio.2023.102471

关键词

Tea polysaccharide conjugates; Gelatin; Layer-by-layer encapsulation; Lactobacillus acidophilus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adverse environments like the gastrointestinal tract can affect the effectiveness of probiotics, so protecting and fully utilizing their effects are important in probiotic research. In this study, green tea polysaccharide conjugate (gTPC) and gelatin were used as encapsulation materials for Lactobacillus acidophilus, and layer-by-layer self-assembly technology was applied. The results showed that increasing the number of deposited layers improved the encapsulation and protection of the probiotics, enhancing their survival rate.
Adverse environments such as the gastrointestinal tract can affect the efficacy of probiotics. Therefore, the adequate protection of probiotics and their total effect exertion are probiotics application research hotspots. Green tea polysaccharide conjugate (gTPC), an anionic polymer, and gelatin as the encapsulation materials, and layer-by-layer self-assembly technology as the method, were applied to encapsulate Lactobacillus acidophilus. Microscopic results showed that with the increase in the number of deposited layers, the encapsulation was more complete. After continuous exposure to simulated gastrointestinal fluid for 120 min, the survival rate of unen-capsulated cells was 53.26%, and encapsulated cells with different deposited layers were 66.00%, 71.99%, 76.94%, and 79.89%, respectively. In addition, Gel/gTPC bilayers can efficiently improve cell thermotolerance and freezing resistance. Results indicated that the more the number of Gel/gTPC bilayers, the more significant the protection is. Therefore, gTPC and Gel are viable materials to protect probiotics through microencapsulation by Layer-by-layer self-assembly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据