4.5 Review

The efficacy and the safety of eltrombopag in pediatric patients with severe aplastic anemia: a systematic review

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1149718

关键词

eltrombopag; severe aplastic anemia; children; safety; efficacy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pediatric patients with acquired aplastic anemia (AAA) have hypocellular bone marrow and pancytopenia. Eltrombopag, an oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist, has shown hematologic improvement in adults with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) refractory to immunosuppressive therapy (IST). The use of ELT and IST as a first-line treatment for SAA in children has been approved by the FDA, but its effects remain controversial. A systematic review of recent literature was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ELT added to IST for pediatric SAA.
Background: Acquired aplastic anemia (AAA) in pediatric patients is a rare disorder characterized by hypocellular bone marrow and pancytopenia. Eltrombopag, an oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist, provides a hematologic improvement in adults with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) refractory to immunosuppressive therapy (IST). The association of ELT and IST was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for adults and children =2 years of age as a first-line treatment for SAA. However, the effects of ELT on pediatric patients with SAA remain controversial and limited.Methods and findings: We conducted a systematic review of the most recent literature from Pubmed, Web of Science, and Embase, published up to 20th December 2022, in order to evaluate the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of ELT added to IST for the treatment of SAA in the pediatric population.Conclusion: Eltrombopag added to the IST has shown a good safety profile, without manifestations of excessive toxic effects, although not all the results obtained from our studies support the addition of ELT to the IST in the first-line treatment of children with SAA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据