4.6 Article

High-Frequency Conductivity of Amorphous and Crystalline Sb2Te3 Thin Films

期刊

COATINGS
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings13050950

关键词

functional chalcogenides; Sb2Te3; phase transition; crystalline and amorphous films

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The results of a study on charge transfer processes in thin amorphous and crystalline Sb2Te3 films in a wide range of frequencies and temperatures are presented. The authors used dielectric spectroscopy to obtain the frequency spectra of conductivity and analyzed the frequency and temperature dependences. They observed a transition from classical correlated barrier hopping (CBH) to quantum mechanical tunneling (QMT) at a certain temperature. The study also identified the activation energies and different types of conductivities for amorphous and crystalline films.
The results of study of charge transfer processes in thin amorphous and crystalline Sb2Te3 films in a wide range of frequencies and temperatures are presented. The frequency spectra of conductivity were obtained by the dielectric spectroscopy method. The authors analyzed the frequency dependences of the conductivity in the electric field and the temperature dependences of the exponent s. A transition from the classical correlated barrier hopping (CBH) to quantum mechanical tunneling (QMT) was observed at a certain temperature T-t. The CBH model allowed the authors to calculate the conductivity parameters of two phases. Two areas with different types of conductivity were revealed on the conduction spectra, and the activation energies of charge transfer processes for amorphous and crystalline films were determined. The following features were discovered: the difference in the temperatures of the change of the charge transfer mechanism and the transition from the semiconductor region to the metal region on the temperature dependence of conductivity. They can help to identify the amorphous phase in the quasi-binary chalcogenide Sb2Te3-GeTe system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据