4.6 Article

Effect of One Sulfate-Reducing Bacterium SRB-Z Isolated from Pearl River on the Corrosion Behavior of Q235 Carbon Steel

期刊

COATINGS
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings13020478

关键词

microbiologically influenced corrosion; isolated sulfate-reducing bacteria; pitting corrosion; FeS-SRB; Fe galvanic couple

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study isolated a strain SRB-Z from the Pearl River in Guangzhou and examined its effect and mechanisms on corrosion of Q235 carbon steel. The results indicate that SRB-Z can cause serious pitting corrosion, with a maximum pit depth of 54 μm after 7 days of immersion corrosion. SRB-Z promoted the cathodic reaction rate of Q235, and pitting corrosion occurred due to galvanic corrosion caused by the formation of an FeS-SRB/Fe galvanic couple under the synergistic effect of the SRB-Z biofilm and its metabolite (H2S) on the Q235 coupon surfaces.
Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) have long been reported to participate in metal corrosion processes in anoxic environments. However, existing theories still need enrichment by identifying more corrosive microorganisms and exploring more plausible microbiologically-influenced corrosion pathways. In this study, a strain SRB-Z was isolated from the Pearl River in Guangzhou, and its effect and mechanisms on corrosion of Q235 carbon steel were examined. The biofilms, corrosion products, pits, and corrosion electrochemistry were characterized by SEM, XPS, CLSM, EDS, white light interferometer 3D profilometry, and electrochemical analysis, respectively. The results of this study indicate that SRB-Z could cause serious pitting of Q235 carbon steel. The maximum pit depth reached 54 mu m after immersion corrosion for 7 days. Strain SRB-Z promoted the cathodic reaction rate of Q235. The relative analyses revealed that pitting corrosion occurred because of galvanic corrosion caused by the formation of an FeS-SRB/Fe galvanic couple under the synergistic effect of the SRB-Z biofilm and its metabolite (H2S) on the Q235 coupon surfaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据