4.6 Article

Reproductive success of jack and full-size males in a wild coho salmon population

期刊

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.221271

关键词

life history; mating systems; reproductive success

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite extensive research on Pacific salmon life histories, little is known about the reproductive success of smaller, immature males (jacks) compared to full-size males. This study examined the reproductive contribution of jacks in a wild population of coho salmon and found that although their individual success was lower, they sired a significant proportion of the population's offspring.
Despite the wealth of research on Pacific salmon Oncorhynchus spp. life histories there is limited understanding of the lifetime reproductive success of males that spend less time at sea and mature at a smaller size (jacks) than full-size males. Over half of returning male spawners can be jacks in some populations, so it is crucial to understand their contribution to population productivity. We quantified adult-to-adult reproductive success (RS) of jacks and their relative reproductive success (RRS) compared to full-size males in a wild population of coho salmon in the Auke Creek watershed, Juneau, Alaska. We used genetic data from nearly all individuals (approx. 8000) returning to spawn over a decade (2009-2019) to conduct parentage analysis and calculate individual RS. The average adult-to-adult RS of jacks (mean = 0.7 and s.e. = 0.1) was less than that of full-size males (mean = 1.1 and s.e. = 0.1). Jack RRS was consistently below 1.0 but ranged widely (0.23 to 0.96). Despite their lower average success, jacks contributed substantially to the population by siring 23% of the total returning adult offspring (1033 of 4456) produced between 2009 and 2015. Our results imply that jacks can affect evolutionary and population dynamics, and are relevant to the conservation and management of Pacific salmon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据