4.7 Article

Stability and strengthening effect of aging induced-nanofeatures in d-ferrite in an austenitic stainless-steel weld

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.112

关键词

Thermal aging embrittlement; Spinodal decomposition; G-phase; Deformation stability; Strengthening effect

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The deformation behavior of 8-ferrite in an aged austenitic stainless-steel weld was studied to understand the contribution of aging-induced nanofeatures to aging embrittlement. The strengthening effect of spinodal decomposition and G-phase precipitation was evaluated and compared using nanopillar compression tests. The results showed that the nanofeatures exhibited different stability during deformation, with G-phase being less effective as an obstacle compared to spinodal decomposition.
The deformation behavior of 8-ferrite in an aged austenitic stainless-steel weld was investigated to obtain insights on the contribution of aging-induced nanofeatures, such as spinodal decomposition and G-phase precipitation, to aging embrittlement. To evaluate the hardening effect of the G-phase, a reversion heat treatment was applied to the aged weld. The strengthening effect of spinodal decomposition and the G-phase was measured using nanopillar compression tests. The deformed microstructure exhibited the dissolu-tion of G-phases but a slight change in the spinodal nanostructure, indicating a clear dif-ference in the stability of the nanofeatures during deformation. The quantitative measurement of the G-phase and the application of the Orowan model showed that the measured strengthening effect from the G-phase was less than that of the estimation, implying that the G-phase was not as effective as an impenetrable obstacle. On the other hand, spinodal decomposition showed high stability after deformation, leading to a noticeable hardening effect.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据