4.7 Article

Effect of tempering temperature on microstructure and mechanical properties of a low carbon bainitic steel treated by quenching-partitioning-tempering (QPT) process

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.061

关键词

Low carbon bainitic steel; Quenching-partitioning-tempering; Carbide; Retained austenite

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of tempering temperature on the microstructure and mechanical properties of QPT processed steel was investigated. The findings show that the yield strength decreases gradually with increasing tempering temperature, while the tensile strength initially decreases and then increases. The elongation exhibits an increasing and then decreasing trend. The best mechanical properties are obtained at a tempering temperature of 340 degrees C, with a yield strength of 1495 MPa, tensile strength of 1806 MPa, elongation of 17.7%, and a product of strength and elongation up to 32.92 GPa%.
The quenching-partitioning-tempering (QPT) treatment was carried out on a low carbon bainitic steel, and the effect of tempering temperature on the microstructure and me-chanical properties of the QPT processed steel was investigated. The findings demonstrate that as the tempering temperature increases, the yield strength decreases gradually, while the tensile strength decreases first and then increases. However, the elongation exhibits a trend of increasing first and then decreasing with increasing the tempering temperature. When the tempering temperature is 340 degrees C, the best mechanical properties can be obtained with the yield strength of 1495 MPa, tensile strength of 1806 MPa, elongation of 17.7%, and product of strength and elongation up to 32.92 GPa%. Such excellent mechanical properties are related to the synergistic combination of tempered martensite, low carbon bainite, retained austenite and carbides.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据