4.6 Article

Coordination Programming of Two-Dimensional Metal Complex Frameworks

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 32, 期 11, 页码 2527-2538

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00156

关键词

-

资金

  1. JST-CREST Development of Atomic or Molecular Two-Dimensional Functional Films and Creation of Fundamental Technologies for Their Applications
  2. JST-PRESTO Hypernano-space Design toward Innovative Functionality
  3. MEXT of Japan [26708005, 26107510, 26220801, 15H00862, 15K13654]
  4. Asahi Glass Foundation
  5. Iketani Science and Technology Foundation
  6. MIKIYA Science and Technology Foundation
  7. Yazaki Memorial Foundation for Science and Technology
  8. Shorai Foundation for Science and Technology
  9. Hitachi Global Foundation
  10. Kumagai Foundation for Science and Technology
  11. Foundation for Interaction in Science & Technology (FIST)
  12. Foundation Advanced Technology Institute
  13. Izumi Science and Technology Foundation
  14. Foundation for The Promotion of Ion Engineering
  15. LIXIL JS Foundation
  16. Iwatani Naoji Foundation
  17. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26620039, 26107510, 15K13654, 26708005, 15H00862] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since the discovery of graphene, two-dimensional materials with atomic thickness have attracted much attention because of their characteristic physical and chemical properties. Recently, coordination nanosheets (CONASHs) came into the world as new series of two-dimensional frameworks, which can show various functions based on metal complexes formed by numerous combinations of metal ions and ligands. This Feature Article provides an overview of recent progress in synthesizing CONASHs and in elucidating their intriguing electrical, sensing, and catalytic properties. We also review recent theoretical studies on the prediction of the unique electronic structures, magnetism, and catalytic ability of materials based on CONASHs. Future prospects for applying CONASHs to novel applications are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据