4.7 Article

A molecular phenology scale of grape berry development

期刊

HORTICULTURE RESEARCH
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhad048

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilized transcriptomic data to establish a molecular phenology scale (MPhS) for tracking the development of grape berries. The MPhS accurately quantified the genetic distance between fruit samples and revealed the complex dynamics of the transcriptional program over berry development. It proved to be a complementary method for mapping grape berry development with higher detail compared to classic approaches based on time or phenotype.
Fruit growth and development consist of a continuous succession of physical, biochemical, and physiological changes driven by a genetic program that dynamically responds to environmental cues. Establishing recognizable stages over the whole fruit lifetime represents a fundamental requirement for research and fruit crop cultivation. This is especially relevant in perennial crops like grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) to scale the development of its fruit across genotypes and growing conditions. In this work, molecular-based information from several grape berry transcriptomic datasets was exploited to build a molecular phenology scale (MPhS) and to map the ontogenic development of the fruit. The proposed statistical pipeline consisted of an unsupervised learning procedure yielding an innovative combination of semiparametric, smoothing, and dimensionality reduction tools. The transcriptomic distance between fruit samples was precisely quantified by means of the MPhS that also enabled to highlight the complex dynamics of the transcriptional program over berry development through the calculation of the rate of variation of MPhS stages by time. The MPhS allowed the alignment of time-series fruit samples proving to be a complementary method for mapping the progression of grape berry development with higher detail compared to classic time- or phenotype-based approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据