4.6 Article

A Case of Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Treated with Carrimycin

期刊

INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 2365-2369

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S407076

关键词

carrimycin; Klebsiella pneumoniae; multidrug-resistant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the urgent issues in bacterial resistance is multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. The lack of available therapeutic options for K. pneumoniae infections leads to negative effects on morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Carrimycin, a macrolide antibiotic, showed effective treatment of a patient with multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae infection. When other antibiotics failed to bring satisfactory results, carrimycin improved the patient's condition and led to hospital discharge. Therefore, carrimycin can be considered as a treatment option for multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae infections that do not respond to conventional anti-infective treatments.
One of the most pressing emerging issues in bacterial resistance is multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. The treatment of K. pneumoniae infections is often problematic because of the lack of available therapeutic options, leading to negative effects on morbidity, mortality, and healthcare-associated costs. Carrimycin is a macrolide antibiotic with good antibacterial effects. In this study, we report a patient diagnosed with multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae infection who was treated with carrimycin. The patient presented with cough, expectoration, dyspnea, and severe hypoxemia requiring noninvasive ventilation. We successively used a variety of antibiotics, including meropenem, tigecycline, and polymyxin, with unsatisfactory results. Finally, we used carrimycin, and the patient's condition improved, resulting in hospital discharge. Therefore, for patients with multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae infection that does not respond to conventional anti-infective treatments, carrimycin can be considered a treatment option.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据