4.6 Review

Introns: the dark matter of the eukaryotic genome

期刊

FRONTIERS IN GENETICS
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1150212

关键词

intron; evolution; splicing; snRNA; spliceosome; eukaryotes; gene expression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article focuses on the role of introns in eukaryotic gene expression by using an intron-centric approach. It discusses how intron architecture influences splicing mechanisms and the impact of spliceosomal snRNAs and their variants on intron splicing. Additionally, the article explores how the presence of introns and the need for splicing affect transcription regulation. Despite the abundant presence of introns in the eukaryotic genome and their emerging role in gene expression regulation, there are still many unexplored areas. Therefore, the article refers to introns as the "dark matter" of the eukaryotic genome and discusses some unresolved questions in the field.
The emergence of introns was a significant evolutionary leap that is a major distinguishing feature between prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes. While historically introns were regarded merely as the sequences that are removed to produce spliced transcripts encoding functional products, increasingly data suggests that introns play important roles in the regulation of gene expression. Here, we use an intron-centric lens to review the role of introns in eukaryotic gene expression. First, we focus on intron architecture and how it may influence mechanisms of splicing. Second, we focus on the implications of spliceosomal snRNAs and their variants on intron splicing. Finally, we discuss how the presence of introns and the need to splice them influences transcription regulation. Despite the abundance of introns in the eukaryotic genome and their emerging role regulating gene expression, a lot remains unexplored. Therefore, here we refer to introns as the dark matter of the eukaryotic genome and discuss some of the outstanding questions in the field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据