4.7 Article

Controllable extrinsic ion transport in two-dimensional perovskite films for reproducible, low-voltage resistive switching

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-MATERIALS
卷 66, 期 6, 页码 2383-2392

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s40843-022-2367-0

关键词

resistive switching; organic-inorganic halide perovskite; ion migration; grain boundary; space-confined

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, it is found that organic-inorganic halide perovskite exhibits fast ion transport within the grain boundaries of two-dimensional films, which can be controlled by the structure of the perovskite. This discovery enables the fabrication of electroforming-free resistive random access memory (RRAM) devices with low set voltage and small variations. It also has potential applications in electronic and photonic circuits.
Organic-inorganic halide perovskite has attracted significant interest in being switching medium for resistive random access memory (RRAM), yet the in-depth understanding of ion spatial distribution and transport kinetics-which is responsible for the filament formation and normally suffers from a paradox between stochasticity and dynamics-remains limited. Herein, we show evidence of space-confined, fast extrinsic ion transport within grain boundaries (GBs) of two-dimensional perovskite films through systematic ex-situ and in-situ studies. The filament growth can be dominated by the geometrical feature of GBs that act as the channel for cation transport in the dielectric film. By tailoring the structure of perovskite GBs, electroforming-free RRAM devices are fabricated with an ultralow set voltage of 0.09 V (1.8kVcm(-1)) and small temporal/spatial variations (< 10%). The devices can also be integrated with flexible substrates for multifunctional applications, including multilevel writing and light erasing. Our work may open new perspectives for regulating filament formation kinetics in RRAMs and provides a reliable building block for future applications in electronic and photonic circuits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据