4.7 Article Data Paper

High-throughput computation of Raman spectra from first principles

期刊

SCIENTIFIC DATA
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-01988-5

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Raman spectroscopy is a widely-used non-destructive method for characterizing materials and determining their atomic structure and chemical composition. This study presents an optimized workflow for efficiently calculating Raman spectra using existing material databases. The workflow was validated by comparing the calculated spectra with experimental results, and high-throughput calculations were performed for a large number of materials from various classes, resulting in a comprehensive database of Raman spectra that agree well with experiments.
Raman spectroscopy is a widely-used non-destructive material characterization method, which provides information about the vibrational modes of the material and therefore of its atomic structure and chemical composition. Interpretation of the spectra requires comparison to known references and to this end, experimental databases of spectra have been collected. Reference Raman spectra could also be simulated using atomistic first-principles methods but these are computationally demanding and thus the existing databases of computational Raman spectra are fairly small. In this work, we developed an optimized workflow to calculate the Raman spectra efficiently and taking full advantage of the phonon properties found in existing material databases. The workflow was benchmarked and validated by comparison to experiments and previous computational methods for select technologically relevant material systems. Using the workflow, we performed high-throughput calculations for a large set of materials (5099) belonging to many different material classes, and collected the results to a database. Finally, the contents of database are analyzed and the calculated spectra are shown to agree well with the experimental ones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据