4.7 Article

Weak ferromagnetism at 48.5 K in rubidium-intercalated biphenyl

期刊

RESULTS IN PHYSICS
卷 49, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106479

关键词

Weak ferromagnetism; Aromatic hydrocarbon; it-Electron; Biphenyl; Rubidium-intercalated

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, high temperature weak ferromagnetism was achieved by intercalating rubidium into the shortest poly(para-phenylene) molecule-biphenyl. The synthesized material exhibited a typical antiferromagnetic transition at 48.5 K, accompanied by a ferromagnetic character in the magnetically ordered region. The weak ferromagnetism was produced by intralayer spin-canted antiferromagnetic and interlayer ferromagnetic spin couplings. This finding enriches the physicochemical functionality of biphenyl and provides a new avenue for the search of it-electron organic magnets in poly(para-phenylene) molecules.
Aromatic hydrocarbon molecules with it-conjugated structure have great potential for the search of exotic states such as high temperature superconductivity and novel quantum magnetism. In this work, we found that high temperature weak ferromagnetism can be achieved by intercalating rubidium into the shortest poly(para-phe-nylene) molecule-biphenyl. Both dc and ac magnetic susceptibility measurements showed that the synthesized material exhibits a typical antiferromagnetic transition at 48.5 K, accompanying a ferromagnetic character in the magnetically ordered region. Combining theoretical calculations and Raman spectroscopic studies, it was found that the mole ratio between rubidium and biphenyl is 1:1, and the molecular magnetic moments are formed by transferring the Rb-5s electrons to the C-2p orbitals. The weak ferromagnetism is produced by intralayer spin -canted antiferromagnetic and interlayer ferromagnetic spin couplings. Our finding enriches the physicochem-ical functionality of biphenyl and opens a window for the search of it-electron organic magnets in poly(para- phenylene) molecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据