4.7 Article

Bandwidth-tunable absorption enhancement of visible and near-infrared light in monolayer graphene by localized plasmon resonances and their diffraction coupling

期刊

RESULTS IN PHYSICS
卷 49, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106471

关键词

Graphene; Light absorption; Plasmon resonance; Diffraction coupling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, both broadband and narrowband absorption peaks are achieved in monolayer graphene by introducing periodic arrays of silver nanodisks. The broadband absorption peak is attributed to localized dipolar plasmon resonances in individual silver nanodisks, while the narrowband absorption peak arises from collective first-order diffraction coupling effect. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the broadband absorption peak can be varied from 100 nm to 50 nm by changing the array period, and the FWHM of the narrowband absorption peak can be tuned from about 6.4 nm to only 0.25 nm, realizing an ultra-narrow sub-nanometer bandwidth.
Bandwidth-tunable light absorption enhancement in monolayer graphene is practically important for graphenebased photoelectric devices. Especially, it is still a huge challenge to achieve high-efficiency graphene absorption with extremely narrow sub-nanometer bandwidth much smaller than one nanometer. In this work, both broadband and narrowband absorption peaks of monolayer graphene are numerically achieved in visible and near-infrared wavelength ranges. The broadband absorption peak is ascribed to localized dipolar plasmon resonances in individual silver nanodisks, and the narrowband absorption peak arises from collective first-order diffraction coupling effect in periodic array of silver nanodisks. By changing the array period, the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the broadband absorption peak can vary from 100 nm to 50 nm. Correspondingly, the FWHM of the narrowband absorption peak is tuned from about 6.4 nm to only 0.25 nm, thus realizing an ultra-narrow sub-nanometer bandwidth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据