4.8 Article

Microbiota-mediated nitrogen fixation and microhabitat homeostasis in aerial root-mucilage

期刊

MICROBIOME
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40168-023-01525-x

关键词

Rhizosphere ecology; Mucilage microhabitat; Diazotroph; Friendly microbe; Microbial homeostasis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals that the root mucilage microbiota in pink lady plants can fix atmospheric nitrogen to support plant growth, with the help of a friendly fungus that maintains the microenvironmental function of the host plant.
Background Plants sustain intimate relationships with diverse microbes. It is well-recognized that these plant-associated microbiota shape individual performance and fitness of host plants, but much remains to be explored regarding how they exert their function and maintain their homeostasis.Results Here, using pink lady (Heterotis rotundifolia) as a study plant, we investigated the phenomenon of microbiota-mediated nitrogen fixation and elucidated how this process is steadily maintained in the root mucilage microhabitat. Metabolite and microbiota profiling showed that the aerial root mucilage is enriched in carbohydrates and diazotrophic bacteria. Nitrogen isotope-labeling experiments, N-15 natural abundance, and gene expression analysis indicated that the aerial root-mucilage microbiota could fix atmospheric nitrogen to support plant growth. While the aerial root mucilage is a hotspot of nutrients, we did not observe high abundance of other environmental and pathogenic microbes inside. We further identified a fungus isolate in mucilage that has shown broad-spectrum antimicrobial activities, but solely allows the growth of diazotrophic bacteria. This friendly fungus may be the key driver to maintain nitrogen fixation function in the mucilage microhabitat.Conclusion The discovery of new biological function and mucilage-habitat friendly fungi provides insights into microbial homeostasis maintenance of microenvironmental function and rhizosphere ecology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据