4.8 Article

Geography, not lifestyle, explains the population structure of free-living and host-associated deep-sea hydrothermal vent snail symbionts

期刊

MICROBIOME
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40168-023-01493-2

关键词

Symbiosis; Hydrothermal vents; Population genomics; Alviniconcha; Mariana Back-Arc; Microbial biogeography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the genomes of free-living and host-associated symbionts of the deep-sea snail Alviniconcha hessleri and found that they have the same population structure but significant differences in gene content, suggesting that geographic isolation and adaptation to local habitat conditions are important determinants of symbiont population structure and intra-host composition.
Background Marine symbioses are predominantly established through horizontal acquisition of microbial symbionts from the environment. However, genetic and functional comparisons of free-living populations of symbionts to their host-associated counterparts are sparse. Here, we assembled the first genomes of the chemoautotrophic gammaproteobacterial symbionts affiliated with the deep-sea snail Alviniconcha hessleri from two separate hydrothermal vent fields of the Mariana Back-Arc Basin. We used phylogenomic and population genomic methods to assess sequence and gene content variation between free-living and host-associated symbionts.Results Our phylogenomic analyses show that the free-living and host-associated symbionts of A. hessleri from both vent fields are populations of monophyletic strains from a single species. Furthermore, genetic structure and gene content analyses indicate that these symbiont populations are differentiated by vent field rather than by lifestyle.Conclusion Together, this work suggests that, despite the potential influence of host-mediated acquisition and release processes on horizontally transmitted symbionts, geographic isolation and/or adaptation to local habitat conditions are important determinants of symbiont population structure and intra-host composition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据