4.6 Article

Study on the cutting force responses in machining multiscale carbon nanotube/carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites

期刊

JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
卷 95, 期 -, 页码 160-170

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.04.012

关键词

Carbon nanotubes; Multiscale composite; CFRP; Cutting force; Machining

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Orthogonal cutting experiments were conducted on carbon nanotube/carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites with varying wt. fractions of multiwalled CNTs (MWCNTs) filled in the epoxy. The study investigated the influence of CNT content, fiber orientation, and depth of cut on the cutting force. Results revealed a different pattern for the cutting force in 135 degrees orientation compared to other orientations. The depth of cut had a more significant effect on the cutting force, particularly when CNTs were included, leading to a shift in the cutting force direction and reduced coefficient of friction along the tool/chip interface.
Orthogonal cutting experiments were performed on the multiscale carbon nanotube/carbon fiber (CNT/CF) reinforced polymer composites with various wt. fractions of multiwalled CNTs (MWCNTs) filled in the epoxy to investigate the machinability of the material. In particular, the characteristics of the cutting force were studied as a response to the CNT content, the fiber orientation and the depth of cut. Results show that the effect of the CNT content on the principle cutting force in 135 degrees orientation shows a different pattern than that in the other ori-entations. The mechanism was studied with an analytical mode proposed for the chip formation process. The depth of cut has a more significant effect on the principle cutting force for the tested condition, with the effect further enhanced by the inclusion of CNTs. Furthermore, with increasing CNT content or depth of cut, the resultant cutting force tends to shift along the cutting direction with a decreased coefficient of friction along the tool/chip interface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据