4.6 Article

Weld formation, arc behavior, and droplet transfer in narrow-gap laser-arc hybrid welding of titanium alloy

期刊

JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
卷 91, 期 -, 页码 44-52

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.02.022

关键词

Titanium alloy; Narrow -gap laser -arc hybrid welding; Weld formation; Arc stability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the weld formation, arc behavior, and droplet transfer in narrow-gap laser-arc hybrid welding of 16 mm-thick TC4 titanium alloy. The penetration depth was influenced by laser power and welding speed, while filler metal height and sidewall penetration were proportional to wire feeding speed. Weld cross-sectional morphologies were classified into inclined, concave, and convex shapes. The optimization of laser power and wire feeding speed improved arc stability.
In this study, the weld formation, arc behavior, and droplet transfer in the narrow-gap laser-arc hybrid welding of 16 mm-thick TC4 titanium alloy were investigated. The penetration depth was mainly affected by the laser power and welding speed while the filler metal height and sidewall penetration were proportional to the wire feeding speed. The weld cross-sectional morphologies can be classified into three types, namely inclined, concave, and convex shapes. By optimizing the laser power and wire feeding speed, the standard deviation sigma of the arc deflection angles was reduced by approximately 73.7 % and 77.9 %, respectively. This indicates that arc stability was enhanced. Increasing the welding speed from 14 to 20 mm/s caused sigma to increase by approximately 343.6 %, indicating that arc stability was weakened. An inclined weld was obtained when droplet transfer deviated from the welding wire axis. A convex weld was formed due to insufficient spreading of the excessively converged molten metal in the middle of the molten pool surface. A concave weld was produced when there was sufficient spreading of the converged molten metal in the middle of the molten pool surface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据