4.6 Article

Ictal ECG-based assessment of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1147576

关键词

epilepsy; sudden unexpected death in epilepsy; cross-frequency coupling; ECG; signal processing; risk assessment; non-linear interaction in cardiac rhythms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous case-control studies were unable to identify ECG features associated with SUDEP risk, leading to the development of a novel metric called alpha. This study used Single Spectrum Analysis, Independent Component Analysis, and cross-frequency phase-phase coupling to assess SUDEP risk and found that alpha was higher in SUDEP patients and predictive of SUDEP risk.
IntroductionPrevious case-control studies of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) patients failed to identify ECG features (peri-ictal heart rate, heart rate variability, corrected QT interval, postictal heart rate recovery, and cardiac rhythm) predictive of SUDEP risk. This implied a need to derive novel metrics to assess SUDEP risk from ECG. MethodsWe applied Single Spectrum Analysis and Independent Component Analysis (SSA-ICA) to remove artifact from ECG recordings. Then cross-frequency phase-phase coupling (PPC) was applied to a 20-s mid-seizure window and a contour of -3 dB coupling strength was determined. The contour centroid polar coordinates, amplitude (alpha) and angle (theta), were calculated. Association of alpha and theta with SUDEP was assessed and a logistic classifier for alpha was constructed. ResultsAlpha was higher in SUDEP patients, compared to non-SUDEP patients (p < 0.001). Theta showed no significant difference between patient populations. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) of a logistic classifier for alpha resulted in an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 94% and correctly classified two test SUDEP patients. DiscussionThis study develops a novel metric alpha, which highlights non-linear interactions between two rhythms in the ECG, and is predictive of SUDEP risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据