4.6 Article

Effect of Few-Layer Graphene on the Properties of Mixed Polyolefin Waste Stream

期刊

CRYSTALS
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cryst13020358

关键词

graphene; mixed polyolefin; waste stream; processability; mechanical properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the influence of adding few-layer graphene (FLG) on the processability and mechanical properties of mixed polyolefin waste stream. The presence of FLG reinforces the composites without hindering processability. The addition of FLG concentrations higher than 4 wt.% results in higher tensile and flexural properties while preserving impact strength.
This work demonstrates how the addition of few-layer graphene (FLG) influences the processability and mechanical properties of the mixed polyolefin waste stream (R-(PE/PP)). Three different types of compounds were investigated: (1) R-(PE/PP) with FLG; (2) blends of R-(PE/PP) with prime polyethylene (PE) or polypropylene (PP) or PP copolymer; and (3) R-(PE/PP) with both the prime polymer and FLG. The processability was assessed by measuring the torque during melt extrusion, the melt flow index (MFI), and viscosity of the compounds. Investigations of the processability and mechanical properties of the composites indicate that the presence of FLG can reinforce the composites without hindering the processability, an unusual but desired feature of rigid fillers. A maximum increase in tensile strength by 9%, flexural strength by 23%, but a reduction in impact strength were observed for the compounds containing R-(PE/PP), 4 wt.% FLG, and 9 wt.% prime PP. The addition of FLG concentrations higher than 4 wt.% in R-(PE/PP), however, resulted in higher tensile and flexural properties while preserving the impact strength. Remarkably, the addition of 10 wt.% FLG increased the impact strength of the composite by 9%. This increase in impact strength is attributed to the dominant resistance of the rigid FLG particles to crack propagation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据