4.6 Article

DCAGS-IoT: Dynamic Cross-Domain Authentication Scheme Using Group Signature in IoT

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app13105847

关键词

Internet of Things; privacy protection; dynamic cross-domain authentication; group signature; blockchain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cross-domain authentication requires no trust gap between domains, and centralized institutions cannot meet data security needs. Therefore, a secure dynamic cross-domain authentication scheme is proposed, using group signature technology and blockchain distributed system architecture in IoT environment.
Cross-domain authentication requires that there is no trust gap between different trust domains that can cause cross-domain devices to exceed the security control scope of the original trust domain and further expose cross-domain authentication systems to security threats. In addition, as relying on the traditional cross-domain authentication means built by centralized institutions cannot meet the data security needs in a big data environment. Therefore, it is necessary to design a secure dynamic cross-domain authentication scheme. In this paper, we propose a dynamic cross-domain authentication scheme (DCAGS-IoT) in the Internet of Things environment using the group signature technology and the distributed system architecture of blockchain. Specifically aiming at the problem of increasing and revoking users in dynamic cross-domain authentication, a user update algorithm with the complexity of O (logN) was designed to manage users in the trust domain. Moreover, we used the characteristics that group signature users can sign on behalf of a group to protect the users' privacy and track suspicious users. Since the size of the signature generated by the scheme is independent of the number of group members N and only depends on the security parameters ?, the efficiency of the protocol implementation is improved, and the security and availability of the authentication scheme are guaranteed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据