4.6 Article

Conductive Ink Printed Fabric Antenna with Aperture Feeding Technique

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app13052902

关键词

antenna feeds; aperture-fed antennas; BLE; conductive textile; inkjet-printed antenna; LoRa; screen-printed antenna; wearable antennas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This manuscript investigates the use of screen-printed and inkjet-printed conductive fabric antennas. The screen-printed antennas showed optimal radiation performance and were used to develop a new fabric antenna feeding technique. The aperture-fed technique involved a single coaxial cable overlayed on a cut-out slot on the ground layer of the patch antenna. Two antenna models for Bluetooth low energy (BLE) and long-range (LoRa) wireless applications were designed, fabricated, and measured, showing good impedance and radiation performance. The screen-printing procedure and feeding technique are presented in this manuscript.
Featured Application Wearable Antenna Technology. Screen-printed and inkjet-printed conductive fabric antennas have been investigated in this manuscript. The former showed optimal radiation performance after fabrication and measurement, which was the basis for developing a new fabric antenna feeding technique. The aperture-fed technique is achieved with a single coaxial cable overlayed on a cut-out slot on the ground layer of the patch antenna. The cable is connected with conductive silver-based epoxy paste with high resilience to mechanical stress. Two antenna models for Bluetooth low energy (BLE) and long-range (LoRa) wireless applications were designed, fabricated, and measured at 2.44 GHz and 868 MHz, respectively, with good impedance and radiation performance. The measured antennas operated from 2.4 to 2.48 GHz (BLE) and 853 to 886 MHz (LoRa) at -10 dB S11. Measured results also showed a 56% radiation efficiency at BLE and 44.9% at LoRa. The screen-printing procedure and feeding technique have been presented in this manuscript.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据