4.6 Article

DEGRADATION OF RIPARIAN FOREST AFFECTS SOIL PROPERTIES AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES PROVISION IN EASTERN AMAZON OF BRAZIL

期刊

LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 482-493

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.2547

关键词

tropical forest; degradation gradient; canopy openness; water flow regulation; erosion control

资金

  1. Maranhao State Research Foundation (FAPEMA)
  2. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)
  3. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brazil's riparian forests are continuously threatened by conversion into agricultural areas, causing not only degradation and loss of vegetation but also negative changes in soil properties and ecosystem services. In order to select vegetation and soil variables that are affected by degradation and to evaluate whether forest structure can be used as a proxy for soil ecosystem services, two watersheds in eastern Amazon were chosen as a study area in which four degradation levels were identified (very high, high, moderate and low), based on forest canopy openness and height. Vegetation structural characteristics, water infiltration rates, and soil properties were evaluated in 24, 1,000m(2) permanent plots. Results indicated that forest degradation significantly reduced soil carbon, phosphorus, cation exchange capacity, silt proportion, total porosity, and water content as well as water infiltration rate. Vegetation structure was a good proxy for monitoring soil ecosystem services (i.e. regulation of water flow, erosion control and life-supporting). Tree height and basal area, as well as herb biomass, were identified as the best vegetation indicators for changes in soil properties that underlie ecosystem services. Application of this strategy may facilitate the monitoring and modeling of riparian forest ecosystem services across broader spatial scales, to help guide efficient restoration efforts and conservation policies. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据