4.6 Article

THE IMPACT OF DEVELOPMENT PLANS ON HYDROLOGICAL CHANGES IN THE SHAZAND WATERSHED, IRAN

期刊

LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT
卷 27, 期 4, 页码 1236-1244

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.2523

关键词

fluvial behavior; industrial development; land degradation; land use change; watershed management

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Development plans are mainly responsible for population changes and the conversion of forest and rangelands into agricultural lands and human settlements. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of population and land use changes are necessary to assess the impacts of change on hydrological processes. However, such important issues have been less considered worldwide particularly in developing countries. Therefore, we selected the Shazand Watershed (1740 km(2)) because of rapid industrialization to track the effects of land use and population changes on streamflow and sediment yield. The data were collected from statistical yearbooks and satellite imageries from 1973 to 2008. All available measurements on discharge and suspended sediment concentration at the Pole doab hydrological station were also collected. The study was conducted for the whole period, as well as the pre-1991 and post-1991 as a basis for the economic development growth in the region. We found that the land use and population changes have occurred in the Shazand Watershed, especially in the vicinity of industrial zones. The results showed that the cities, industrial zones, roads, and bare lands quickly increased from 58.8 to 134.3 km(2) during post-1991. The flow durations, sediment rating curves and trend analyses indicated distinct variations in the relationship between streamflow and sediment and also caused changes within different periods. Based on the results, the mean annual flow and sediment yield in post industrialization (1991-2008) were respectively 0.84 and 1.19 times of those for pre-industrialization period and the annual sediment yield increased from 25,000 to 29,850 Mg. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据