The Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of Possible Remote Assessments for Measuring Countermovement Jump: My Jump 2, HomeCourt & Takei Vertical Jump Meter

Featured Application The same tool could be used repeatedly to track the changes in CMJ performance. Average jump heights should be analyzed. Practitioners and sports professionals without extensive knowledge of assessment could self-administer CMJ tests using these devices. Mobile applications and portable assessments make remote self-assessment of the countermovement jump (CMJ) test possible. This study aimed to investigate the concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of three portable measurement systems for CMJ. Thirty physically active college students visited the laboratory twice, with two days in between, and performed three jumps each day. All jumps were recorded by My Jump 2, HomeCourt, and the Takei Vertical Jump Meter (TVJM) simultaneously. Results indicated significant differences among the three systems (p < 0.01). HomeCourt tended to present the highest jump height mean value (46.10 +/- 7.57 cm) compared with TVJM (42.02 +/- 8.11 cm) and My Jump 2 (40.85 +/- 7.86 cm). High concurrent validities among assessments were found (r = 0.85-0.93). Good to excellent reliability of jump assessments was demonstrated (ICC3,1 = 0.80-0.96). Reliable coefficients of variation were shown in all measurements (2.58-5.92%). Significant differences were revealed among the three apparatuses while they demonstrated high intra-device test-retest reliability. TVJM was the most reliable, and average jump heights were recommended for analysis.

Automated summary

This study aimed to investigate the concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of three portable measurement systems for CMJ. Results showed significant differences among the three systems, with HomeCourt presenting the highest jump height mean value and TVJM demonstrating the best reliability. Average jump heights were recommended for analysis.