4.6 Article

The Influence of Oscillation Parameters on the Formation of Overhead Welding Seams in the Narrow-Gap GMAW Process

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app13095519

关键词

oscillation arc; NG-GMAW; overhead welding; weld bead formation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, the GMAW welding method is adopted to improve the welding quality of thick-walled pipelines. The formation characteristics of the weld and the influence of arc oscillation parameters on the welding process are studied. It was found that defects such as finger-shaped penetrations and lack of sidewall fusion can occur due to gravity. The oscillation width and sidewall dwell time have different effects on the welding quality.
Thick-walled X80 pipelines for oil and gas transportation are difficult to relocate due to their large size. In the process of narrow-gap overhead welding, welding defects, such as bulges and lack of sidewall fusion, can appear easily. To avoid these defects and to improve the welding quality of thick-walled pipelines, the GMAW welding method is adopted in this paper. The formation characteristics of the weld and the influence of arc oscillation parameters, such as the oscillation width and sidewall dwell time, on the formation process of narrow-gap overhead welding seams are studied. In this research, it was found that, in the NG-GMAW overhead welding position, there was a downward trend in the middle of the formed surface of the weld pool. Defects, such as finger-shaped penetrations and lack of sidewall fusion, were prone to occur due to gravity. The increased oscillation width was beneficial for reducing the protrusion in the middle of the weld seam, but an excessive oscillation width can easily cause undercut defects. The sidewall dwell time has little effect on the protrusion in the middle of the weld seam, but it can increase sidewall penetration, thereby avoiding the occurrence of incomplete sidewall penetration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据