4.6 Article

Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis in Ball Bearings Subjected to Hydrodynamic and Mixed Lubrication

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app13095660

关键词

computational modeling; finite element method (FEM); rough surface contact; lubrication; friction analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a mathematical and computational model to analyze sliding friction in lubricated contact between bearing surfaces using a realistic 3D model on a microscopic scale. The fluid-structure interaction model evaluates the effects of lubricant film thickness on friction in hydrodynamic and mixed lubrication regimes. Higher contact pressures were observed at the peaks of asperities, particularly during mixed lubrication where the fluid volume is smaller. The calculated friction coefficients, obtained through a homogenization procedure of shear and normal forces in hydrodynamic and mixed lubrication, were accurate and fell within the range specified in the Stribeck curve. The results demonstrate the capability of the computational model to examine the effects of lubrication on rough surface contact.
The mathematical and computational modeling of the lubricated contact between bearing surfaces is presented to analyze the sliding friction using a realistic 3D model on a microscopic scale. The fluid-structure interaction model evaluates the effects of lubricant film thickness on friction in hydrodynamic and mixed lubrication regimes. Higher contact pressures are seen at the peaks of asperities, especially during mixed lubrication, in which the fluid volume is smaller. Calculated friction coefficients from a homogenization procedure of shear and normal forces in the hydrodynamic and mixed lubrication, close to 0.0045 and 0.014, respectively, were accurate and within the range specified in the Stribeck curve. Results demonstrate the computational model allows examining the effects of lubrication on contact between rough surfaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据