4.6 Article

Effects of Footpad Slope, Movement Direction and Contact Part of Foot on Foot-Based Interactions

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app13116636

关键词

foot movement; foot interface design; foot touchpad; movement direction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to improve the speed and accuracy of touching a touchpad with the feet while seated. The study found that moving the foot at a 30 degrees angle to the right was the most effective direction, using the big toe as the touch area resulted in the best speed and accuracy, and a slope angle of 15 degrees increased work efficiency. These findings can be used for designing foot interfaces.
Feet cannot perform tasks as quickly and with as much dexterity as hands. However, due to the heavy workload placed on hands, there is potential for feet to replace or assist them . In order to use feet more effectively, this study aims to find ways to increase the speed and accuracy of directly touching a touchpad with the feet while in a seated position. The study investigates the effects of three factors: the slope of the touchpad, the direction of the foot movement, and the touch area of the foot used. Regarding the direction of the foot movement, the study found that the most effective direction for both accuracy and speed was at a 30 degrees angle to the right when the front of the right foot was set at 0 degrees. The 0 degrees and 60 degrees angles showed similar efficiencies, but were lower than the 30 degrees angle. The study also found that using the big toe as the touch area resulted in the best speed, accuracy, and subjective satisfaction. The index toe was the second-best option, while using the ball of the foot was the least accurate and slowest option. Lastly, using an slope angle of 15 degrees for the touchpad was found to increase work efficiency compared to using a 7 degrees slope angle. These findings can serve as guidelines for designing foot interfaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据