Size Preference of Live Fish Prey in the Pellet-Consuming Pikeperch

Featured Application Authors are encouraged to provide a concise description of the specific application or a potential application of the work. This section is not mandatory. The production of pikeperch in a recirculation aquaculture system (RAS) is of growing importance. However, the use of combined technologies may also be justified, especially in countries with larger pond areas. However, this requires the most effective adaptation of pellet-consuming individuals to pond conditions. Foraging training, a form of environmental enrichment to compensate for the poor environment in hatchery rearing, can play a major role in this. The aim of our study was to investigate the prey size preference already observed in wild pikeperch, during prey capture by intensively reared naive individuals. We investigated predation success, latency, number of attempts during the process, and size distribution, in a total of 152 foraging trials of 38 pikeperch fingerlings (mean TL = 90.65 mm) at three different prey sizes (predator-prey length ratio (PPR): 0.11, 0.22, 0.33). Although predation on medium-large prey was more successful overall, it was achieved in more attempts and with greater latency. Small prey was captured with the fewest attempts. These results suggest that when calculating prey size in the foraging training of pikeperch, it is recommended to use a 0.11-0.22 PPR less than the optimal PPR described for wild individuals.

Automated summary

The study investigates the prey size preference of wild pikeperch and suggests using a predator-prey length ratio (PPR) of 0.11-0.22 in foraging training, which is smaller than the optimal PPR for wild individuals.