4.6 Article

Evaluation of Excavation Ergonomics of Drill and Blast Method Based on Game Theory G2-EW-TOPSIS Model

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 13, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app13127205

关键词

tunnel; drilling and blasting method; ergonomics evaluation; TOPSIS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The demand for tunnel construction is increasing rapidly, leading to more attention on tunnel mechanization construction to improve excavation ergonomics. In order to enhance the evaluation of tunnel drilling and blasting method excavation ergonomics, a set of evaluation methods based on the game theory G2-EW-TOPSIS model is proposed. This evaluation method includes a comprehensive index system and calculation of subjective and objective weights using different methods. The proposed model is applied to analyze the excavation ergonomics of the Shangtianling Tunnel, showing its effectiveness in identifying main factors and providing reference value.
The demand for tunnel construction continues to grow by leaps and bounds. Therefore, tunnel mechanization construction is receiving more and more attention for improving excavation ergonomics. To enhance the scientific and comprehensive evaluation results of tunnel drilling and blasting method excavation ergonomics, a set of evaluation methods of tunnel drilling and blasting method excavation ergonomics based on the game theory G2-EW-TOPSIS model is proposed. From the three dimensions of drilling efficiency, construction process duration, and synergistic influence factors, a tunnel drilling and blasting construction ergonomics evaluation index system consisting of 11 indicators such as perimeter hole drilling efficiency, drilling duration, construction quality, and comprehensive cost is constructed. The subjective and objective weights of evaluation indicators are calculated by using the improved sequential relationship analysis method (G2 method) and entropy weight method, respectively, and the combination weights are carried out by using game theory method (GTM) with the Nash equilibrium as the goal. The indices are classified into five grades: excellent (I), good (II), average (III), rather poor (IV), and poor (V), according to the daily tunnel construction. The excavation ergonomics index to be evaluated is calculated using the combined weights, and the comprehensive evaluation index of excavation ergonomics to be evaluated is calculated using the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS). The proposed rating model was used to analyze the excavation ergonomics of the Shangtianling Tunnel in the Chizhou-Huangshan High-Speed Railway using jumbo drills (JD) and drilling machines (DM) in large- and small-mileage construction, respectively, and to obtain the excavation ergonomics rating and comprehensive evaluation rating of each evaluation object. The research results show that the established excavation ergonomics evaluation model can effectively identify the main factors affecting the excavation ergonomics of the drill and blast method, and has a certain reference value.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据