4.6 Article

A Method to Determine the Torque Ripple Harmonic Reduction in Skewed Synchronous Reluctance Machines

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app13052949

关键词

step skewing; torque ripple harmonics; finite element analysis; synchronous reluctance machines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A discrete skew methodology is introduced to investigate the impact of skewing angle on electromagnetic torque in SynRM design. A novel approach is proposed to estimate the amplitude of each torque ripple component based on the skewing angle. The reduction factor for each harmonic component is derived in a general form, allowing for the determination of the overall torque ripple waveform. The proposed method is validated through the analysis of two SynRMs, achieving a torque ripple reduction of up to 70%.
In this paper, a discrete skew methodology is presented to understand the effect of skewing angle on electromagnetic torque in SynRM design. A new approach is proposed to estimate the amplitude of each torque ripple component as a function of skewing angle. The reduction factor for each harmonic component is derived in general form, allowing for the determination of overall torque ripple waveform. The validity of the proposed method is evaluated through the examination of two SynRMs, resulting in a torque ripple reduction of up to 70%. The results obtained through the use of a proposed analytical ripple reduction estimator and FEA evaluation showed good agreement. The proposed skewing technique was applied on a previously optimized triple-barrier SynRM with a positive outcome: a consistent torque ripple reduction tackling relevant harmonic components. The analysis of harmonic distribution of torque ripple is mandatory for the selection of the optimal skewing strategy when following the proposed method, with two-step skewing recommended for mostly-purely-sinusoidal torque waveforms, and multi-step skewing recommended for machines with multiple higher-magnitude harmonic components.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据