4.8 Article

DEX-Induced SREBF1 Promotes BMSCs Differentiation into Adipocytes to Attract and Protect Residual T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Cells After Chemotherapy

期刊

ADVANCED SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202205854

关键词

adipogenesis; bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs); chemotherapy; minimal residual disease (MRD); T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is observed that adipocytes in the bone marrow microenvironment (BMM) of T-ALL patients increase significantly after exposure to chemotherapeutic drugs. Adipocytes attract T-ALL cells through releasing CXCL13 and support leukemia cell survival by activating the Notch1 signaling pathway. In addition, the differentiation of BMSCs to adipocytes induced by DEX contributes to MRD in T-ALL and can be targeted for reducing the recurrence rate.
T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is an aggressive malignant blood disorder with a high rate of relapse. Patients relapse as a result of minimal residual disease (MRD), which originates from residual T-ALL cells in the bone marrow microenvironment (BMM). In the present study, it is observed that adipocytes increase dramatically in the BMM of T-ALL patients after exposure to chemotherapeutic drugs. Then, it is proved that adipocytes attract T-ALL cells by releasing CXCL13 and support leukemia cell survival by activating the Notch1 signaling pathway via DLL1 and Notch1 binding. Furthermore, it is verified that dexamethasone (DEX) induces adipogenic differentiation by enhancing the expression of SREBF1 in bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BMSCs), and an SREBF1 inhibitor significantly decreases the adipogenic potential of BMSCs and the subsequent ability of adipocytes to support T-ALL cells in vitro and in vivo. These findings confirm that the differentiation of BMSCs to adipocytes induced by DEX contributes to MRD in T-ALL and provides an auxiliary clinical treatment to reduce the recurrence rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据