4.8 Article

Polyphotosensitizer-Based Nanoparticles with Michael Addition Acceptors Inhibiting GST Activity and Cisplatin Deactivation for Enhanced Chemotherapy and Photodynamic Immunotherapy

期刊

ADVANCED SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202300175

关键词

chemotherapy; immunotherapy; Michael addition acceptor; nanoparticles; photodynamic; prostate cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A reactive oxygen species (ROS)-responsive polyphotosensitizer-based nanoparticle (NP2) is designed to inhibit GST activity and cisplatin deactivation, as well as stimulate antitumor immune response, thus providing a new paradigm for the multimodal treatment of tumors.
Glutathione S-transferase (GST), which is a key enzyme in the conjugation reaction of glutathione (GSH), is overexpressed in cancer cells, leading to cisplatin deactivation and ultimately drug resistance. In addition, many tumors are immune cold tumors, limiting the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Herein, a reactive oxygen species (ROS)-responsive polyphotosensitizer-based nanoparticle (NP2) with Michael addition acceptors inhibiting GST activity and cisplatin deactivation is designed. Under the 808 nm light irradiation, on the one hand, the Michael addition acceptor in NP2 can react with GST and inhibit its activity, thereby decreasing the GSH conjugation and reducing the GSH-mediated deactivation of cisplatin and improving its chemotherapeutic effect. On the other hand, NP2+L induces more ROS production in prostate tumor cells, which can further induce type II immunogenic cell death (ICD) and stimulate a stronger antitumor immune response. It is found that NP2 under the 808 nm light irradiation (NP2+L) can increase PD-L1 expression on the surface of prostate cancer cells. Subsequently, NP2+L combined with PD-L1 treatment is found to simultaneously enhance the efficacies of chemotherapy and photodynamic immunotherapy in prostate tumors, providing a new paradigm for the clinical multimodal treatment of tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据