4.7 Article

Effect of Graphite Nanoplatelet Size and Dispersion on the Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Epoxy-Based Nanocomposites

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano13081328

关键词

nanocomposite; graphite nanoplatelets; thermal conductivity; tensile strength; size-dependence; dispersion; ultrasonication; attrition mill

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effect of graphite nanoplatelet (GNP) size and dispersion on the thermal conductivities and tensile strengths of epoxy-based composites. Increasing the GNP size and loading amount resulted in higher thermal conductivities but lower tensile strengths in the GNP/epoxy composites. Interestingly, the tensile strength reached a maximum value at a low GNP content of 0.3% and then decreased, regardless of GNP size. The dispersion of fillers in the matrix had a greater influence on tensile strength, while the size and loading number of fillers were more likely related to thermal conductivity.
This study investigated the effect of graphite nanoplatelet (GNP) size and dispersion on the thermal conductivities and tensile strengths of epoxy-based composites. GNPs of four different platelet sizes, ranging from 1.6 to 3 mu m, were derived by mechanically exfoliating and breaking expanded graphite (EG) particles using high-energy bead milling and sonication. The GNPs were used as fillers at loadings of 0-10 wt%. As the GNP size and loading amount increased, the thermal conductivities of the GNP/epoxy composites increased, but their tensile strengths decreased. However, interestingly, the tensile strength reached a maximum value at the low GNP content of 0.3% and thereafter decreased, irrespective of the GNP size. Our observations of the morphologies and dispersions of the GNPs in the composites indicated that the thermal conductivity was more likely related to the size and loading number of fillers, whereas the tensile strength was more influenced by the dispersion of fillers in the matrix.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据