4.7 Article

Assessment of Carbon Nanotubes on Barrier Function, Ciliary Beating Frequency and Cytokine Release in In Vitro Models of the Respiratory Tract

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano13040682

关键词

carbon nanotubes; toxicity; in vitro models; respiratory tract; bronchial epithelium; alveolar epithelium; ciliary beating frequency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The toxicity of inhaled nanoparticles was assessed using air-liquid interface cultures of respiratory cells and reconstructed bronchial and alveolar tissues. The results showed no significant adverse effects on the bronchial and alveolar models when exposed to nanoparticles at doses corresponding to the maximum estimated lifetime exposure of workers, except for a slight increase in interleukin 6 secretion in the alveolar model.
The exposure to inhaled carbon nanotubes (CNT) may have adverse effects on workers upon chronic exposure. In order to assess the toxicity of inhaled nanoparticles in a physiologically relevant manner, an air-liquid interface culture of mono and cocultures of respiratory cells and assessment in reconstructed bronchial and alveolar tissues was used. The effect of CNT4003 reference particles applied in simulated lung fluid was studied in bronchial (Calu-3 cells, EpiAirway (TM) and MucilAir (TM) tissues) and alveolar (A549 +/-THP-1 and EpiAlveolar (TM) +/-THP-1) models. Cytotoxicity, transepithelial electrical resistance, interleukin 6 and 8 secretion, mucociliary clearance and ciliary beating frequency were used as readout parameters. With the exception of increased secretion of interleukin 6 in the EpiAlveolar (TM) tissues, no adverse effects of CNT4003 particles, applied at doses corresponding to the maximum estimated lifetime exposure of workers, in the bronchial and alveolar models were noted, suggesting no marked differences between the models. Since the doses for whole-life exposure were applied over a shorter time, it is not clear if the interleukin 6 increase in the EpiAlveolar (TM) tissues has physiological relevance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据