4.7 Article

Multilayer Graphene as an Endoreversible Otto Engine

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano13091548

关键词

magnetic cycle; quantum Otto cycle; quantum thermodynamics; graphene

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the performance of a finite-time, endoreversible Otto heat engine with a working medium of monolayer or multilayered graphene under an external magnetic field. The energy spectrum of multilayered graphene is strongly dependent on the number of layers, which affects its thermodynamic behavior. The engine efficiency is found to have a simple relationship with the number of layers of graphene in the working medium. Bilayer and trilayer working mediums can achieve higher efficiency at maximum power than a classical endoreversible Otto cycle, while a monolayer graphene working medium has the same efficiency at maximum power as a classical working medium. These findings suggest that layered graphene can be a useful material for constructing efficient thermal machines for various quantum device applications.
We examine the performance of a finite-time, endoreversible Otto heat engine with a working medium of monolayer or multilayered graphene subjected to an external magnetic field. As the energy spectrum of multilayer graphene under an external magnetic field depends strongly on the number of layers, so too does its thermodynamic behavior. We show that this leads to a simple relationship between the engine efficiency and the number of layers of graphene in the working medium. Furthermore, we find that the efficiency at maximum power for bilayer and trilayer working mediums can exceed that of a classical endoreversible Otto cycle. Conversely, a working medium of monolayer graphene displays identical efficiency at maximum power to a classical working medium. These results demonstrate that layered graphene can be a useful material for the construction of efficient thermal machines for diverse quantum device applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据