4.7 Article

Influence of Stress Jump Condition at the Interface Region of a Two-Layer Nanofluid Flow in a Microchannel with EDL Effects

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano13071198

关键词

microchannel; nanofluid; stress jump condition; porous medium; electric double layer (EDL)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the influence of stress jump conditions on a steady, fully developed two-layer magnetohydrodynamic electro-osmotic nanofluid in a microchannel. The nanofluid is partially filled into the microchannel, while a porous medium saturated with nanofluid is immersed into the other half. The Brinkmann-extended Darcy equation is used to explain the nanofluid flow in the porous region. Electric double layers are examined in both regions, and at the interface, the Ochoa-Tapia and Whitaker's stress jump condition is considered. The results show that considering the change in shear stress at the interface significantly affects fluid flow problems.
The influence of stress jump conditions on a steady, fully developed two-layer magnetohydrodynamic electro-osmotic nanofluid in the microchannel, is investigated numerically. A nanofluid is partially filled into the microchannel, while a porous medium, saturated with nanofluid, is immersed into the other half of the microchannel. The Brinkmann-extended Darcy equation is used to effectively explain the nanofluid flow in the porous region. In both regions, electric double layers are examined, whereas at the interface, Ochoa-Tapia and Whitaker's stress jump condition is considered. The non-dimensional velocity, temperature, and volume fraction of the nanoparticle profiles are examined, by varying physical parameters. Additionally, the Darcy number, as well as the coefficient in the stress jump condition, are investigated for their profound effect on skin friction and Nusselt number. It is concluded that, taking into account the change in shear stress at the interface has a significant impact on fluid flow problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据