4.7 Article

Influence of the Nature of Aminoalcohol on ZnO Films Formed by Sol-Gel Methods

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano13061057

关键词

ZnO films; sol-gel; aminoalcohol; structural characterization; elemental analysis; IR spectroscopy; XRD; SEM; PL; UV-VIS spectroscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Comparative studies were conducted on the formation of ZnO thin films using sol-gel method with different aminoalcohols and solvent. The results showed that the choice of aminoalcohol affected the ink stability and the composition, structure, morphology, and properties of the films.
Here we present comparative studies of: (i) the formation of ZnO thin films via the sol-gel method using zinc acetate dihydrate (ZAD), 2-methoxyethanol (ME) as solvent, and the aminoalcohols (AA): ethanolamine, (S)-(+)-2-amino-1-propanol, (S)-(+)-2-amino-3-methyl-1-butanol, 2-aminophenol, and aminobenzyl alcohol, and (ii) elemental analyses, infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, absorption and emission spectra of films obtained after deposition by drop coating on glass surface, and thermal treatments at 300, 400, 500 and 600 degrees C. The results obtained provide conclusive evidences of the influence of the AA used (aliphatic vs. aromatic) on the ink stability (prior to deposition), and on the composition, structures, morphologies, and properties of films after calcination, in particular, those due to the different substituents, H, Me, or Pr-i, and to the presence or the absence of a -CH2 unit. Aliphatic films, more stable and purer than aromatic ones, contained the ZnO wurtzite form for all annealing temperatures, while the cubic sphalerite (zinc-blende) form was also detected after using aromatic AAs. Films having frayed fibers or quartered layers or uniform yarns evolved to neuron-like patterns. UV and photoluminescence studies revealed that these AAs also affect the optical band gap, the structural defects, and photo-optical properties of the films.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据