4.7 Review

Passing of Nanocarriers across the Histohematic Barriers: Current Approaches for Tumor Theranostics

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano13071140

关键词

nanoparticles; tumor theranostics; cell-penetrating peptide; histohematic barrier; blood-tissue barrier; blood-tumor barrier

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanocarriers have shown potential in translational oncology, but their practical application in living organisms is hindered by physiological barriers. This review focuses on approaches to enhance the translocation of nanoparticles across blood-tissue barriers and accumulate in tumors. These approaches include the functionalization of particle surfaces with cell-penetrating peptides and the use of chemical agents or physical methods to increase barrier permeability.
Over the past several decades, nanocarriers have demonstrated diagnostic and therapeutic (i.e., theranostic) potencies in translational oncology, and some agents have been further translated into clinical trials. However, the practical application of nanoparticle-based medicine in living organisms is limited by physiological barriers (blood-tissue barriers), which significantly hampers the transport of nanoparticles from the blood into the tumor tissue. This review focuses on several approaches that facilitate the translocation of nanoparticles across blood-tissue barriers (BTBs) to efficiently accumulate in the tumor. To overcome the challenge of BTBs, several methods have been proposed, including the functionalization of particle surfaces with cell-penetrating peptides (e.g., TAT, SynB1, penetratin, R8, RGD, angiopep-2), which increases the passing of particles across tissue barriers. Another promising strategy could be based either on the application of various chemical agents (e.g., efflux pump inhibitors, disruptors of tight junctions, etc.) or physical methods (e.g., magnetic field, electroporation, photoacoustic cavitation, etc.), which have been shown to further increase the permeability of barriers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据