4.5 Article

Relation between Viscosity and Conductivity of CaO-MgO-FeO-Al2O3-SiO2 System for Copper Smelting Slags

期刊

METALS
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met13040786

关键词

copper smelting slag; aluminum oxide; viscosity; conductivity; structural unit

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The viscosity and conductivity of smelting slag of copper oxide concentrate play a crucial role in reducing the operating temperature. In this study, slag samples with different ferrous oxide contents were prepared and their viscosity and conductivity were measured. The results showed that the change in slag composition affects its viscosity and conductivity.
The viscosity and conductivity of the smelting slag of copper oxide concentrate are important for reducing the operating temperature. In this study, seven slag samples were prepared by the reductive smelting of copper oxide concentrate with different ferrous oxide contents. The viscosity and conductivity data of these CaO-MgO-FeO-Al2O3-SiO2 samples were measured in the temperature range of 1290 similar to 1410 degrees C. Based on the structural features of aluminosilicate melts, the change and dependency relationships of their viscosity and conductivity were analyzed. The results show that there is a strong tendency to form orthosilicate even when the slag composition is acidic. The formation of fayalite would allow more Al3+ to form pyroxene with the six-coordinated structure. As a result, the polymerization degree and viscosity of the melt will be reduced. The [AlO](4)(5-) as a network former will reduce the bonding strength of the structural units, thus reducing the slag viscosity at high temperature. In the experimental range, the logarithm of viscosity of each slag sample has a good linear relationship with its logarithm of conductivity. However, there is no uniform linear equation for these complex slags with wide composition variations. These results have potential guiding significance for the copper smelting process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据