4.5 Article

The Influence of Foaming Agents on Aluminium Foam Cell Morphology

期刊

METALS
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met13061146

关键词

aluminium foam; calcium carbonate; titanium hydride; computed tomography; foam morphology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The choice and mass fraction of foaming agents have a significant impact on the size and number of metal foam cells. Aluminium foams were produced using titanium hydride (TiH2) and calcium carbonate (CaCO3) as foaming agents. Foams foamed with TiH2 have much larger cells compared to CaCO3 agent. The quantity of CaCO3 affects the morphology of aluminium foam, with a smaller quantity of CaCO3 resulting in a macrostructure with smaller cells. The sphericity and compactness indicate that TiH2 foaming agent forms cells of a more regular shape compared to CaCO3 agent.
The choice of foaming agent and its mass fraction significantly affect the size and number of metal foam cells. The powder metallurgy process was used to produce aluminium foams with the addition of various foaming agents: titanium hydride (TiH2) and calcium carbonate (CaCO3). TiH2 was added in an amount of 0.4 wt.%, while the quantity of CaCO3 varied between 3 and 5 wt.%. The produced foams, with approximately the same degree of porosity, were scanned using a non-destructive computed tomography method. The number, size, equivalent diameter, sphericity, and compactness of cells were analysed on the obtained three-dimensional models. The results showed that foams foamed with TiH2 have much larger cells compared to CaCO3 agent. By considering the influence of CaCO3 fraction on the morphology of aluminium foam, it follows that a smaller quantity of CaCO3 (3 wt.%) provides a macrostructure with smaller cells. Samples with five wt.% CaCO3 contain slightly larger cells but are still much smaller than foams with TiH2 foaming agent at the same degree of porosity. The sphericity and compactness indicate that TiH2 foaming agent forms cells of a more regular shape compared to CaCO3 agent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据