4.7 Review

Alternatives to antibiotics-a pipeline portfolio review

期刊

LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 239-251

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00466-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Health (England) Policy Research Programme
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. Department of Health
  4. BBSRC [BB/M00810X/1, BB/L024209/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L024209/1, BB/M00810X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antibiotics have saved countless lives and enabled the development of modern medicine over the past 70 years. However, it is clear that the success of antibiotics might only have been temporary and we now expect a long-term and perhaps never-ending challenge to find new therapies to combat antibiotic-resistant bacteria. A broader approach to address bacterial infection is needed. In this Review, we discuss alternatives to antibiotics, which we defined as non-compound approaches (products other than classic antibacterial agents) that target bacteria or any approaches that target the host. The most advanced approaches are antibodies, probiotics, and vaccines in phase 2 and phase 3 trials. This first wave of alternatives to antibiotics will probably best serve as adjunctive or preventive therapies, which suggests that conventional antibiotics are still needed. Funding of more than 1.5 pound billion is needed over 10 years to test and develop these alternatives to antibiotics. Investment needs to be partnered with translational expertise and targeted to support the validation of these approaches in phase 2 trials, which would be a catalyst for active engagement and investment by the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry. Only a sustained, concerted, and coordinated international effort will provide the solutions needed for the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据