4.6 Article

Clinical trials of tuberculosis vaccines in the era of increased access to preventive antibiotic treatment

期刊

LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 380-390

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00084-X

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the urgent need for new tuberculosis vaccines and improved tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) regimens. It examines how HIV vaccine trials have incorporated preventive treatment and proposes trial designs that integrate TPT. The considerations for each design in terms of trial validity, efficiency, participant safety, and ethics are summarized.
Approximately 10 center dot 6 million people worldwide develop tuberculosis each year, representing a failure in epidemic control that is accentuated by the absence of effective vaccines to prevent infection or disease in adolescents and adults. Without effective vaccines, tuberculosis prevention has relied on testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and treating with antibiotics to prevent progression to tuberculosis disease, known as tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT). Novel tuberculosis vaccines are in development and phase 3 efficacy trials are imminent. The development of effective, shorter, and safer TPT regimens has broadened the groups eligible for TPT beyond people with HIV and child contacts of people with tuberculosis; future vaccine trials will be undertaken in an era of increased TPT access. Changes in the prevention standard will have implications for tuberculosis vaccine trials of disease prevention, for which safety and sufficient accrual of cases are crucial. In this paper, we examine the urgent need for trials that allow the evaluation of new vaccines and fulfil the ethical duty of researchers to provide TPT. We observe how HIV vaccine trials have incorporated preventive treatment in the form of pre-exposure prophylaxis, propose trial designs that integrate TPT, and summarise considerations for each design in terms of trial validity, efficiency, participant safety, and ethics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据