4.7 Article

Experimental investigation of a packed bed membrane reactor for the direct conversion of CO2 to dimethyl ether

期刊

JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION
卷 72, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2023.102513

关键词

Carbon membrane reactor; Proof of concept; Model validation; CO2 hydrogenation; DME synthesis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study experimentally compares the performance of a packed bed membrane reactor (PBMR) and a conventional packed bed reactor (PBR) for CO2 conversion to dimethyl ether (DME). The PBMR outperforms the PBR in most conditions, with improvements in CO2 conversion and DME yield. Higher sweep gas-to-feed ratios increase water removal and improve PBMR performance, but result in the removal of other products. Higher temperatures selectively enhance the rWGS reaction but reduce DME yield due to methanol loss. Higher transmembrane pressures are not beneficial for PBMR performance. Reactor models developed in previous studies accurately describe the performance of both reactors and can be used for further optimization and simulation.
In this study, the performance of a packed bed membrane reactor (PBMR) based on carbon molecular sieve membranes for the one-step CO2 conversion to dimethyl ether (DME) is experimentally compared to that of a conventional packed bed reactor (PBR) using a CuO-ZnO-Al2O3/HZSM-5 bifunctional catalyst. The PBMR outperforms the PBR in most of the experimental conditions. The benefits were greater at lower GHSV (i.e., conditions that approach thermodynamic equilibrium and water formation is more severe), with both XCO2 and YDME improvements of +35-40 % and +16-27 %, respectively. Larger sweep gas-to-feed (SW) ratios increase the extent of water removal (ca. 80 % at SW=5), and thus the performance of the PBMR. Nevertheless, alongside the removal of water, a considerably amount of all products are removed as well, leading to a greater improvement in the CO yield (+122 %) than the DME yield (+66 %). Higher temperatures selectively improve the rWGS reaction, leading to a lower YDME with respect to the PBR at 260 degrees C, due to the significant loss of methanol. Furthermore, larger transmembrane pressures (AP) were not beneficial for the performance of the PBMR due to the excess reactant loss (i.e., 98-99 % at AP = 3 bar). Finally, the reactor models developed in our previous studies accurately describe the performance of both the PBR and PBMR in the range of tested conditions. This result is of high relevance, since the reactor models could be used for further optimization studies and to simulate conditions which were not explored experimentally.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据