4.6 Article

Whole Exome Sequencing to Find Candidate Variants for the Prediction of Kidney Transplantation Efficacy

期刊

GENES
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes14061251

关键词

whole-exome sequencing; single nucleotide polymorphisms; kidney transplant; exonic; intronic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated exon loci variants in kidney transplant recipients using high-resolution Next Generation Sequencing. The results identified nine pathogenic variants in rejecting patients and 86 SNPs in successful transplant patients. These variants play important roles in short-term graft survival.
Introduction: Kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment strategy for some end-stage renal disease (ESRD); however, graft survival and the success of the transplantation depend on several elements, including the genetics of recipients. In this study, we evaluated exon loci variants based on a high-resolution Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) method. Methods: We evaluated whole-exome sequencing (WES) of transplanted kidney recipients in a prospective study. The study involved a total of 10 patients (5 without a history of rejection and 5 with). About five milliliters of blood were collected for DNA extraction, followed by whole-exome sequencing based on molecular inversion probes (MIPs). Results: Sequencing and variant filtering identified nine pathogenic variants in rejecting patients (low survival). Interestingly, in five patients with successful kidney transplantation, we found 86 SNPs in 63 genes 61 were variants of uncertain significance (VUS), 5 were likely pathogenic, and five were likely benign/benign. The only overlap between rejecting and non-rejecting patients was SNPs rs529922492 in rejecting and rs773542127 in non-rejecting patients' MUC4 gene. Conclusions: Nine variants of rs779232502, rs3831942, rs564955632, rs529922492, rs762675930, rs569593251, rs192347509, rs548514380, and rs72648913 have roles in short graft survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据