4.6 Review

Exercise improves depression through positive modulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). A review based on 100 manuscripts over 20 years

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1102526

关键词

BDNF expression; exercise mode; neuroplasticity; depression treatment; physical activity intervention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this review was to explore the association between peripheral levels of BDNF and exercise regimes, as well as its relation to depression and antidepressant treatment. Antidepressants and acute exercise, particularly high-intensity, elevate BDNF levels in healthy humans and clinical populations. Exercise is recognized in the management of depression, but studies failed to establish a relationship between depression severity and changes in peripheral BDNF. Antidepressants stimulate longer-term biochemical changes compared to acute exercise.
The aim of this review was to explore the relevant neurobiology and the association between peripheral levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and acute and short to long-term exercise regimes, as well as its relation to depression and antidepressant treatment. A 20-year literature search was conducted. The screening process resulted in 100 manuscripts. Antidepressants as well as acute exercise, particularly high-intensity, elevates BDNF in healthy humans and clinical populations, as evidenced from aerobic and resistance-based studies. Although exercise is increasingly recognised in the management of depression, acute and short-term exercise studies have failed to establish a relationship between the severity of depression and changes in peripheral BDNF. The latter rapidly returns to baseline, possibly indicating a quick re-uptake by the brain, aiding its neuroplasticity functions. The timescale of administration needed for the antidepressants to stimulate biochemical changes is longer than similar increases with acute exercise.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据